Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Manuja, Manoj
- Three-pronged (3P) Approach to Strengthen Feedback Mechanism in Engineering Education
Abstract Views :67 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Punjab, India ., IN
1 Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Punjab, India ., IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No 3 (2023), Pagination: 01-08Abstract
Effectiveness in teaching-learning process and attainment of program outcomes are the areas for which educational institutes are largely accountable. Internal feedback mechanism is the key to enhance the quality of teaching-learning process thereby contributing towards attainment of program outcomes and hence important for the growth of institute. This mechanism should be strong enough for receiving adequate information from stakeholders to help in tweaking or improving the processes. Feedback from students has been a common mechanism being followed in the educational institutes. Also, the industry feedback is considered for curriculum revision. In this paper we will discuss about three pronged (3P) approach for such a feedback mechanism. Three prongs in this approach are the closed loop feedback mechanism, sensitizing students about the importance of feedback and agility in feedback process. Designing feedback and analyzing the feedback received from all the sources in tandem is the backbone of this approach and has been discussed in detail in this paper. The paper presents case study of implementation of proposed 3P approach to enhance the students' learning of computer programming course.Keywords
Feedback, Teaching-Learning Process, Feedback Design, Feedback Analysis, Agility.
References
- Miriam Bar-Yam, Kathleen Rhoades, Linda Booth Sweeney, Jim Kaput, and Yaneer Bar-Yam (2002). Complex Systems Perspectives on Education and the Education System. New England Complex Systems Institute.
- Niva Wengrowicz (2014). Teachers' pedagogical change mechanism – Pattern of structural relations between teachers pedagogical characteristics and teachers' perceptions of transactional distance (TTD) in different teaching environments”, Computers & Education, Vol 76. pp 190-198.
- Yong Zhao and Jim Watterston (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, Vol 22, pp 3-12.
- Temitayo Deborah Oyedotun 2020. Sudden change of pedagogy in education driven by COVID-19: Perspectives and evaluation from a developing country.Research in Globalization,Vol 2.
- Bianka Malecka, David Boud & David Carless (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum, Teach ing in Hig her Edu catio n, DO I: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
- V.G. Renumol, G. Krishna Kumar, G. Gopeekrishnan and Nisha S. Raj (2017). Effective Teaching Learning Environment through Constructive Feedback: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 30, Iss 3, pp 200-205.
- Luke Mandouit (2018). Using student feedback to improve teaching. Educational Action Research, Vol 26, Iss 5, pp 755-769.
- Holger Gaertner (2014). Effects of student feedback as a method of self-evaluating the quality of teaching”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol 42, pp 91-99.
- Alexandra Meikleham and Ron Hugo (2017). Understanding informal feedback to improve online course design. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 45, Iss 1, pp 4-21.
- Chenicheri Sid Nair, Arun Patil and Patricie Mertova (2011). Enhancing the quality of engineering education by utilising student feedback. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol 36, Iss 1, pp 3-12.
- David Carless (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol 44, Iss 5, pp 705-714.
- Irene Garcia, Richard W. James, Paul Bischof and Anne Baroffio (2017). Self-Observation and Peer Feedback as a Faculty Development Approach for Problem-Based Learning Tutors: A Program Evaluation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol 29, Iss 3, pp 313-325.
- Meenakshi Sankaran and Amiya Kumar Rath (2021). Assessing Undergraduate Engineering Programmes using Alumni Feedback. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 34, 2021, Special issue, pp 733-741.
- Renée E. Stalmeijer et. Al. (2022). Continuous enhancement of educational quality – fostering a quality culture. AMEE Guide No. 147, Medical Teacher,pp1-11, 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057285
- Marilla Svinicki, (2001). Encouraging Your Students to Give Feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. Wiley Publishers. Pp 17 - 24. 10.1002/tl.24.
- Rikkert M. van der Lans, Wim J. C. M. van de Grift & K. van Veen (2018). Developing an Instrument for Teacher Feedback: Using the Rasch Model to Explore Teachers' Development of Effective Teaching Strategies and Behaviors, The Journal of Experimental Education, 86:2, pp 247-264,DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086